The environmental impacts of preparation for reuse: A case study of WEEE reuse in Germany

Abstract

Abstract According to the European waste management hierarchy, preparation for reuse (PfR) is preferable to recycling. From an environmental point of view, reuse is beneficial, if the impacts that arise during a certain usage duration of a reused product are smaller than those of a new product. If this is not the case, reuse is not beneficial to recycling. This study explores potential benefits of PfR compared to other waste management options for four white goods (washing machine, refrigerator, range, freezer) and four small electric devices (PC, printer, monitor, laptop) by the use of Life Cycle Assessment. These eight devices account for 68% by weight of all the collected waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) in Germany. The results show, that the assumption that reuse is preferable to recycling does not apply to every case. Especially the impact categories of global warming, water consumption and cumulative energy demand are strongly dominated by the use phase of white goods, therefore a reuse of inefficient devices should be avoided. The results show that a reuse of products with an European energy efficiency rating of D and C is not recommended for any of the analyzed products. For small electric devices, the use phase is less dominant in comparison to the production, therefore reuse leads to significant saving potentials in almost all impact categories. A comparison of energy efficiency classes allows for product-specific decisions, whereas the assessment approach based on average devices yields for generalizable recommendations. Therefore, the results support environmentally conscious consumer decisions about the acquisition of a new versus a second-hand product and enable End-of-Life decision making in terms of the separation of reusable devices at collection points.