Abstract

Energy audits are used world-wide for developing energy efficiency projects. Industrial consumers have complex energy supply, generation and distribution networks and a variety of energy use installations. Romanian industrial companies became more interested in the last years in implementing Energy Management Systems in accordance with ISO 50001 standard. This paper presents a comparison of using the current way of developing energy audits and the concepts provided by the ISO group of standards, by quantifying the environmental impact reduction generated by each methodology. Authors pointed out that current legislation does not fully match the rigors of the ISO 50001 group of standards when evaluating the Energy Baseline (EB), the Energy Performance Indicators (EPI) or the Energy Performance Improvement Actions (EPIA), thus leading to a lower global energy efficiency improvement in the hypothesis of implementing all the recommended EPIAs [1]. Identifying and developing energy efficiency measures following the recommendations of the energy management and energy savings group of standards may be more consistent and less risky for the industrial company, which in turn can lead to an overall improvement of the Carbon Footprint [2].

Highlights

  • The improvement of energy efficiency is a strategic objective of the national energy policy [3]

  • Even though the regulatory authority constantly tries to improve the Energy Audit Guide that provides rules that every auditing licensed entity must follow, the lack of metering energy inputs/outputs, the impossibility to correlate energy flows with the final product and the lack of an energy performance financial support scheme that can benefit from the aforementioned energy performance improvement, leads to an unsystematic implementation of the identified Energy Performance Improvement Actions (EPIA)

  • The main issues that derived from the general requirements of the ISO 50001 group of standards were the normalization of the Energy Performance Indicators (EPI), respectively the EnB

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The improvement of energy efficiency is a strategic objective of the national energy policy [3]. While keeping in mind that the Diesel consumption is generated by the cars fleet, which has the structure detailed, the impact of replacing 44 of the existing vans (3.5 to 7 ton) with lighter, more efficient, 3.5 ton utility vehicles with an average consumption of 9 1/100 km was analysed. EUR/van; The yearly maintenance cost per van while out of the warranty period: 500

Classic Energy Audit approach
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call