Abstract

PurposeDue to the urgency and the magnitude of the environmental problems caused by food supply chains, it is important that the recommendations for packaging improvements given in life cycle assessment (LCA) studies of food rest on a balanced consideration of all relevant environmental impacts of packaging. The purpose of this article is to analyse the extent to which food LCAs include the indirect environmental impact of packaging in parallel to its direct impact. While the direct environmental impact of food packaging is the impact caused by packaging materials’ production and end-of-life, its indirect environmental impact is caused by its influence on the food product’s life cycle, e.g. by its influence on food waste and on logistical efficiency.MethodsThe article presents a review of 32 food LCAs published in peer-reviewed scientific journals over the last decade. The steps of the food product’s life cycle that contribute to the direct and indirect environmental impacts of packaging provide the overall structure of the analytical framework used for the review. Three aspects in the selected food LCAs were analysed: (1) the defined scope of the LCAs, (2) the sensitivity and/or scenario analyses and (3) the conclusions and recommendations.Results and discussionWhile in packaging LCA literature, there is a trend towards a more systematic consideration of the indirect environmental impact of packaging, it is unclear how food LCAs handle this aspect. The results of the review show that the choices regarding scope and sensitivities/scenarios made in food LCAs and their conclusions about packaging focus on the direct environmental impact of packaging. While it is clear that not all food LCAs need to analyse packaging in detail, this article identifies opportunities to increase the validity of packaging-related conclusions in food LCAs and provides specific recommendations for packaging-related food LCA methodology.ConclusionsOverall, we conclude that the indirect environmental impact of packaging is insufficiently considered in current food LCA practice. Based on these results, this article calls for a more systematic consideration of the indirect environmental impact of packaging in future food LCAs. In addition, it identifies a need for more packaging research that can provide the empirical data that many food LCA practitioners currently lack. In particular, LCA practitioners would benefit if there were more knowledge and data available about the influence of certain packaging characteristics (e.g. shape, weight and type of material) on consumer behaviour.

Highlights

  • Food supply chains are one of the main contributors to several pressing environmental problems such as climate change, eutrophication and loss of biodiversity (EEA 2016)

  • The results of the review show that the choices regarding scope and sensitivities/scenarios made in food life cycle assessment (LCA) as well as conclusions about packaging focus on the consideration of the direct environmental impact of packaging

  • It shows that with regard to the scope, a consideration of the direct environmental impact of packaging in food LCAs is seldom coupled with a parallel consideration of its indirect impact

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Food supply chains are one of the main contributors to several pressing environmental problems such as climate change, eutrophication and loss of biodiversity (EEA 2016). Several studies have shown that the indirect environmental impact of packaging is of greater relative importance in many food supply chains than its direct environmental impact (Büsser and Jungbluth 2009; Silvenius et al 2014; Wikström and Williams 2010). The indirect environmental impact of packaging is the impact caused by the influence that packaging has on the food product’s life cycle. It includes the influence on the amount of food waste and the possibilities of recovering food waste (Verghese et al 2015), the influence on transport efficiency in the food supply chain (García-Arca et al 2014) and the influence on consumers behaviour affecting food transport, storage and preparation in households (Zampori and Dotelli 2014)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call