Abstract
The role of the legal system, particularly through the Anti-Corruption Commission (KPK) and other law enforcement agencies in Indonesia, is pivotal in addressing high-profile corruption cases. However, these efforts have been impeded by factors such as political interference, resource limitations, and a lack of anti-corruption culture, posing challenges for the future. This article employs a normative legal research methodology, utilizing statutory and conceptual frameworks. Data collection involved a thorough literature review of relevant laws and regulations related to anti-corruption issues. In this context, the collaboration between the legal system and civil society emerges as a synergistic force in establishing a robust anti-corruption ecosystem. Emphasizing preventive measures like asset declarations and conflict-of-interest regulations offers valuable insights into the proactive role the legal system can assume in averting corruption before it spreads.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
