Abstract
AbstractThe Coase theorem prediction that the final allocation of resources will be independent of the liability rule relies on one important assumption: an individual will value a right or an asset the same whether considering its acquisition or its loss (MWP maximum willingness to pay should equal MCA minimum compensation to accept). However, the marginal rate of substitution between one good and another seems to be affected by a phenomenon described as the endowment effect. In such a case, the individual who is assigned the property right is more likely to retain it and the Coase theorem does not hold anymore.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
