Abstract
Surviving in three distinct authorial versions (A, B, and C) and over sixty manuscripts, including complete texts of each version, spliced texts of two or more versions, fragments, and excerpts, William Langland's Piers Plowman presents exceptional difficulties for readers, bibliographers, and textual critics. Sporadically throughout the text, both the medieval scribes who copied the poem and the modern scholars who propose to edit its three versions have disagreed about where one poetic line ends and the next begins. Uncertainty about the end of the line throws into doubt all other textual and literary discriminations, so the two case studies in mislineation of multilingual lines considered in this essay (B.13.19 / C.15.21–22 and B.15.69 / C.16.229–30) illustrate a larger swath of interpretive problems in this recalcitrant medieval text.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
