Abstract

This paper principally aims at examining the impact of capital requirements regulation on bank operating efficiency in Tanzania. The study employs bank level data for the period between 2009 and 2015. The findings show a positive and significant relationship between capital ratio and bank operating efficiency. This shows that commercial banks in Tanzania with more stringent capital regulations are more operationally efficient. This relationship proposes that capital adequacy does not only strengthen financial stability by providing a larger capital cushion but also improves bank operating efficiency by preventing a moral hazard problem between shareholders and debt-holders. This result may also imply that the increased regulations on capital requirements influence the bank’s decision to revisit their internal operations strategy in terms of strong corporate governance, risk assessment methods, credit evaluation procedures, employment of more qualified staffs, and enhanced internal control procedures. Another key finding is an inverse relationship between non-performing Loans (credit risk) and bank operating efficiency. The implication of this relationship may simply mean that the bank’s total loan and advances in combination with total deposit either due from customers or from other banks are of little importance in determining the operational efficiency of banks. This probably implies that the amount of money banks loan out is too excessive, which would attract a greater chance of default. The paper lays down some recommendations: first, banks in Tanzania are advised to invest in more advanced technological innovations to reduce the staff costs and other operating expenses to increase their operational efficiency; and, second, bank management is also advised to be more careful in the loan screening process to reduce the incidence of non-performing loans.

Highlights

  • The core function of any commercial bank is the extension of loans and the larger proportion of banks’ assets is formed by loans (Fungacova et al 2014)

  • The level of capital adequacy in Tanzania is determined by the Bank of Tanzania

  • The implication of the negative relationship between bank operating efficiency and total loans to total deposits might mean that a bank’s total loans and advances in combination with total deposits either from customers or from other banks are of little importance in determining the operational efficiency of banks

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The core function of any commercial bank is the extension of loans and the larger proportion of banks’ assets is formed by loans (Fungacova et al 2014). Bank supervisors, throughout Africa, and Bank of Tanzania, called for banks to hold as buffer a specified level of capital to cushion for the portion of risk they take, and advise banks to sustain minimum regulatory capital levels to prevent the possibility of insolvency and stability of the banking system, as advocated by Berger et al (1995) and Aggarwal and Jacques (2001). Capital adequacy as an essential mechanism to protect banks’ solvency and profitability is among the riskiest businesses in the financial market The reason for this is due to the presence of potential information asymmetry between banks and borrowers which may result in loan default. This leads to bank losses and, banks are obliged to have adequate capital, to remain solvent, and to avoid the failure of the financial system and remain efficient in their operations (Aggarwal and Jacques 2001)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call