Abstract
Interim and conservatory measures can play an important role in international arbitrations, operating as holding orders preserving the status quo pending the outcome of the parties’ dispute. Often, the demand for such measures is urgent and arises before the arbitral tribunal is in place. This article considers the role of the Emergency Arbitrator in meeting that demand. Specifically, it considers the concerns voiced by some regarding the status of the Emergency Arbitrator and the enforceability of his or her Order or Award. Are those concerns valid or overstated? Irrespective, are we nonetheless embarking upon a ‘new dawn’ as the use and practice of the Emergency Arbitrator takes greater hold and gains maturity?
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
