The Emergence Of A New Plan, " Responsibility To Protect"

Abstract

In the international traditional system, absolute of states over their citizens in internal dimension and their independent activities in external relations was considered as governments Exclusive and universal right and the principles of respect for sovereignty and non-interference in the internal affairs are the pillars of the international system’s regulations. Today, with the evolution of the international community and the emergence of new concepts and values in the light of humanitarian thought, national sovereignty cannot be considered as an absolute concept and we cannot rely on Iron walls bordering countries which passing from them only depends on the Leviathan” .So it can be said that the “rule” has lost its classic sense as a great power. From the first years of the twenty-first century, doctrine of to entered the legal literature as a norm of international law and as a solution in response to the shortcomings of the international system facing gross violations of basic human rights, with three main elements named prevention, reaction and reconstruction. The main purpose of the present doctrine is dealing with violations of basic human rights in the territory of a country and in this regard, the most important change occurs where the government is unable or unwilling to protect the citizens rights because of disputes causeing racial, ethnic and religious reasons that in such cases, the responsibility will be transferred to the international community.