Abstract
The elimination and subsequent reinstatement of five varsity sports at the University of California, Berkeley during the 2010-11 academic year may provide a modern success story in college sports, but the events which transpired at Berkeley also exposed many of the fundamental tensions inherent to NCAA Division I athletics today. This success story might be read as a cautionary tale, highlighting the exclusion of the college athletes themselves within the decision-making process. While their sports were ultimately saved, these young people's lives were transformed. Grounded in critical theory, this study provides a systematic evaluation of student athlete responses to sport elimination, examining their perceptions of the decision-making process and the reasons underlying why particular sports were eliminated while others were not. Although gender equity issues were considered important to the decision, few gender differences were found among the impacted college athletes. In addition to the perceived importance of financial considerations underlying the institutional decision to eliminate sports, participants also reported feeling that the university over-invested in revenue sports at the expense of non-revenue or Olympic sports.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
