Abstract

BackgroundThe effect of diabetic retinopathy (DR) on the development of sight-threatening cataracts was assessed using the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan.MethodsPatients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM) and DR were enrolled in the study group. Age- and sex-matched DM individuals without DR and patients without DM served as the DM control group and non-DM control group, respectively, both with 1:4 ratios. The outcome was set as the performance of cataract surgery. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to calculate the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of DR considering multiple factors underlying cataract formation.ResultsA total of 3297 DR patients, 13,188 DM control patients and 13,188 non-DM control subjects were enrolled. The study group included 919 events of sight-threatening cataracts (27.87%), the DM control group included 1108 events (8.40%), and the non-DM control group included 957 events (7.26%). A multivariable analysis indicated that the study group presented a higher aHR of cataract surgery (2.93, 95% CI: 2.60–3.30) and a higher cumulative probability of cataract surgery than both the DM control and non-DM control groups (both log rank P < 0.001). In addition, both the proliferative DR (3.90, 95% CI: 3.42–4.45) and nonproliferative DR (2.35, 95% CI: 2.08–2.65) subgroups showed a higher aHR of cataract surgery than the DM control group.ConclusionThe presence of DR increases the risk of sight-threatening cataracts that warrant surgery, and the effect is prominent among patients with both proliferative DR and nonproliferative DR.

Highlights

  • The effect of diabetic retinopathy (DR) on the development of sight-threatening cataracts was assessed using the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan

  • Throughout the follow-up period, 919 sight-threatening cataract events (27.87%) occurred in the study group, which presented a higher crude relative risk than the Diabetes mellitus (DM) control group (1108 events, 8.40%) and the non-DM control group (957 events, 7.26%) (Table 3)

  • The multivariate analysis of demographic data, systemic diseases, prominent ocular diseases and medications that may lead to sight-threatening cataracts showed that the study group presented a significantly higher adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) than the non-DM control group (2.93, 95% Confidence intervals (CI): 2.60–3.30)

Read more

Summary

Methods

Patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM) and DR were enrolled in the study group. Age- and sexmatched DM individuals without DR and patients without DM served as the DM control group and non-DM control group, respectively, both with 1:4 ratios. The outcome was set as the performance of cataract surgery. Cox propor‐ tional hazard regression was used to calculate the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of DR considering multiple factors underlying cataract formation

Results
Conclusion
Background
Material and method
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call