Abstract
The application for trademark registration must be made by the applicant in good faith, which is regulated in Law Number 20 Year 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications. This thesis research aims to find out and analyze the Court Decision related to the cancellation of the "PENTAKOSTA" trademark which has an element of bad faith and how the basis of the judge's consideration in deciding the case of cancellation of the "PENTAKOSTA" trademark. The type of research used in this study is normative legal research. By using the approach of legislation and case approach. From the results of this study it can be concluded that the relationship between the cancellation of registered trademarks with good faith is on the application for registration of the trademark and the Panel of Judges who decided to cancel the trademark after reviewing the bad faith. In the study of Decision Number 1/Pdt.Sus.HKI/ Merek/2021/PN.Niaga.JktPst is not appropriate in applying the law of evidence which is that there is no finding of bad faith in the registration of the trademark by the Defendant. In addition, the legal consequences of the cancellation of the trademark "PENTAKOSTA" is the end of legal protection provided by the state.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
