Abstract

The first-principle calculations of PtWZ (Z = In, Tl, Sn, and Pb) half-Heusler alloys were calculated by WIEN2k for GGA and GGA+mBJ methods. First, the ferromagnetic (FM) phases were obtained more energetically stable than non-magnetic (NM) and antiferromagnetic (AFM) phases in each alloy. The Curie temperatures of PtWIn, PtWTl, PtWSn, and PtWPb alloys were obtained as 286.98 K, 467.14 K, 721.98 K, and 1114.31 K, respectively, by utilizing the energy differences of the AFM and FM phases. In each method and alloy used, spin-up electrons showed metallic character. In the GGA method, PtW(In, Tl) alloys have direct band gaps of 0.72044 eV and 0.91488 eV in spin-down electrons, while PtW(Sn, Pb) alloys have indirect band gaps of 1.2558 eV and 1.11892 eV, respectively. In the GGA+mBJ method, the bandgap directions in all compounds remained the same. Here, band gaps in PtW(In, Tl, Sn, and Pb) alloys were obtained as 0.99918 eV, 1.15385 eV, 1.42676 eV, and 1.17497 eV, respectively. While the total magnetic moment values of PtW(In, Tl) half-Heusler alloys were obtained as 1.00 μ B/f.u., the total magnetic moments of PtW(Sn, Pb) alloys were obtained as 2.00 μ B/f.u. These results are in full agreement with the Slater-Pauling rule. According to elastic calculations, PtWIn, PtWTl, PtWSn, and PtWPb half-Heusler alloys are elastically stable and ductile.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.