Abstract

This article highlights the hitherto unexplored varying binding modes of the deprotonated natural dye indigo (H2L) and its bidirectional noninnocent potential. The reaction of H2L with the selective metal precursor Ru(II)(acac)2(CH3CN)2 (acac(-) = acetylacetonate) leads to the simultaneous formation of paramagnetic Ru(III)(acac)2(HL(-)) (1; blue solid) and diamagnetic Ru(II)(acac)2(L) (2; red solid), which have been characterized by standard analytical, spectroscopic, and structural analysis. Crystal structures establish that the usual trans configurated and twisted monodeprotonated HL(-) and unprecedented cis configurated nearly planar dehydroindigo (L) bind to the {Ru(acac)2} metal fragment via the N(-),O and N,N donors, forming six- and five-membered chelates, respectively. It also reveals the existence of intramolecular N-H···O hydrogen-bonding interaction between the NH proton and C═O group at the back face of the coordinated HL(-), in addition to an intermolecular N-H···O hydrogen bonding between the NH proton of HL(-) of Molecule B and oxygen atom of the nearby acac of the second molecule (Molecule A) in the asymmetric unit of 1. The specific role of the electron-rich {Ru(acac)2} metal fragment in stabilizing the cis-configuration of the electron-deficient L in 2 has been pointed out. Both 1 and 2 exhibit reversible one-electron oxidation and successive three reductions with varying Kc (comproportionation constant) values in the range of 10(18)-10(6). The potentials for the redox processes of 2 are positively shifted with respect to those of 1. The involvement of the metal or HL(-)/L or mixed metal-HL(-)/L-based orbitals in the accessible redox processes of 1(n) and 2(n) has been analyzed by spectroelectrochemistry, EPR at the paramagnetic states, and DFT calculated MO compositions/spin density distributions. The collective consideration of the experimental results and DFT/TD-DFT data has ascertained the participation of both the metal fragment {Ru(acac)2} and the HL(-)/L in the redox processes, which in effect result in mixed electronic structural forms of 1(n) and 2(n) (n = +1, 0, -1, -2, -3).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.