Abstract

IN a recent communication, Morris and Schmeising1 applied the empirical extrapolation of ionization potentials of isoelectronic ions to determine the binding energy of the O− ion (the atomic oxygen electron affinity). By extending the order of the extrapolation through eight isoelectronic ions (to S7+), they find a slightly higher value, 1.044 eV., than is found from the more usual quadratic extrapolation. Stating that experimental determinations of the electron affinity have given results in unresolved conflict, Morris and Schmeising refer to three discordant values. A value of about 2.2 eV. was obtained by a thermodynamic evaluation of the probability of attachment of electrons to atomic oxygen at a hot filament, and from electron impact studies undertaken originally to determine the dissociation energies of molecular nitrogen and carbon monoxide. The value of 1.48 eV. is given by the optical threshold for photodetachment from O− by Smith and Branscomb. The value of 1.05 eV., which coincides with Morris and Schmeising's extrapolation, was obtained by Schuler and Bingel from the analysis of a certain discrete band spectrum thought to be due to a transition between two bound states of OH−. (For the original references see Morris and Schmeising1.) My purpose here is to resolve these apparent ambiguities.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.