Abstract
The explanatory variable used in most previous studies of land-nonland substitution, assessed or appraised land value, is subject to considerable measurement error. There is evidence that this biases the substitution elasticity from a true value of unity to a measured value in the 0.5 to 0.8 range. An hedonic method of measuring land value is proposed and applied to the Chicago residential sales data developed by Berry and Bednarz. Substitution elasticities are estimated within a CES framework from the two measures of land value; after correction for a vintage effect, appraised land value indicates that the elasticity is 0.57 whereas the hedonic measure of land values supports a unitary substitution elasticity. Therefore, the errors-in-variables hypothesis is confirmed and the use of a Cobb- Douglas production function is suggested.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
