Abstract
No area of humanistic endeavor makes plainer than the study of the eighteenth century that the generic divisions among disciplines and the traditional institutional frame-work of specialized university departments are incongruent with the prismatic nature of current leading research. No century - dominated as it was by the comparativist met-aphor in the study of human activity - makes plainer the pressing need for establishing workable models to assess the efficacy of individual, and competing hypotheses, and for determining how these are to be placed within a well-articulated, cross-disciplinary, or as yet unspecialized, con-text.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
