Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explore the nature of the “output” of a university and of the inputs to it, in order to see how far measures of productivity or efficiency can be devised. It is assumed to be desirable to use the resources of the institution, necessarily limited, as efficiently as possible in the pursuit of its objects. But there are logical difficulties about any overall measure of efficiency: a university is not like a coal mine. However, useful results can be obtained from a partial approach, and a number of suggestions are offered. A central difficulty is the lack of a sufficient understanding of the nature of the work-load which is most likely to make a person of high intellectual ability effective. It is suggested that a variety of tasks is essential: and this has implications for the use of ancillary staff. A number of sub-sections of university activity can be made more productive provided that minimum standards of performance can be specified. This is occasionally easy, but the specification of performance for (e.g.) central administration is a difficult matter. It is suggested that over-enthusiasm for the better use of buildings and equipment may not always be wise, but that common-sense and operational research can nevertheless lead to significant savings in the use of capital resources.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.