Abstract

A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to address the question, 'What is the efficacy of litter management strategies to reduce morbidity, mortality, condemnation at slaughter, or total antibiotic use in broilers?' Eligible studies were clinical trials published in English evaluating the efficacy of litter management in broilers on morbidity, condemnations at slaughter, mortality, or total antibiotic use. Multiple databases and two conference proceedings were searched for relevant literature. After relevance screening and data extraction, there were 50 trials evaluating litter type, 22 trials evaluating litter additives, 10 trials comparing fresh to re-used litter, and six trials evaluating floor type. NMAs were conducted for mortality (61 trials) and for the presence or absence of footpad lesions (15 trials). There were no differences in mortality among the litter types, floor types, or additives. For footpad lesions, peat moss appeared beneficial compared to straw, based on a small number of comparisons. In a pairwise meta-analysis, there was no association between fresh versus used litter on the risk of mortality, although there was considerable heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 66%). There was poor reporting of key design features in many studies, and analyses rarely accounted for non-independence of observations within flocks.

Highlights

  • RationaleLitter management strategies serve a vital role in the poultry industry, with the potential to impact bird health, welfare, and productivity (Dunlop et al, 2016)

  • We did not present the results of the incoherence analysis from Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA), which measures the consistency of the network, because we presented the consistency analysis results based on the Bayesian analysis described previously in the methods section, rather than the frequentist method used by CINeMA

  • In terms of the interventions investigated in each trial, there were 50 trials that evaluated the type of litter, 22 trials that evaluated litter additives, 11 trials that evaluated litter depth, 10 trials that compared fresh to re-used litter, six trials that evaluated flooring type, and one trial that evaluated windrowing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Litter management strategies serve a vital role in the poultry industry, with the potential to impact bird health, welfare, and productivity (Dunlop et al, 2016). Two key functions of litter in the context of disease control are to absorb moisture from bird excrement, and to minimize exposure of birds to manure to prevent infections that may result in the need to use antibiotics (Shepherd and Fairchild, 2010; Kaukonen et al, 2016). Prophylactic or metaphylactic antimicrobials may be used alongside litter management strategies to improve flock health by reducing the rates of infectious diseases (Chen and Jiang, 2014). Improved litter management is one strategy that could reduce the need for antimicrobials to control infectious diseases in the poultry industry.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call