Abstract

ObjectivesNon-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) is not always performed clinically if the diagnosis of ureteral calculi has been confirmed using other radiographic imaging modalities. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of successful extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) without assistance of NCCT.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with symptomatic solitary ureteral stones who underwent ESWL between November 2015 and January 2016. Abdominal plain radiography or intravenous urography were performed before ESWL for localization. The exclusion criteria were repeated sessions of ESWL for the target stone and congenital genitourinary tract anomalies. The demographic characteristics, clinical history, medical charges, or imaging features of the stones were recorded. Successful treatment was defined as no fragments detected on radiography or ultrasonography in 4 weeks. For radiolucent calculi, successful treatment was regarded as cases without hydronephrosis, symptoms, or hematuria. Patients experiencing intractable pain and undergoing subsequent auxiliary surgeries were regarded as having ESWL treatment failure.ResultsAge (odds ratio [OR], 1.042; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.007–1.078), history of ipsilateral renal or ureteral calculi episodes (OR, 2.669; 95% CI, 1.281–5.687), stone burden (OR, 3.499; 95% CI, 1.284–9.530), and radiopaque stone (OR, 2.351; 95% CI, 1.049–5.267) were significant predictors of ESWL failure in all patients.ConclusionsFor treating symptomatic ureteral stones, those with smaller size, radiolucency, and without a history of ipsilateral renal or ureteral calculi could be considered for first-line therapy with ESWL.

Highlights

  • Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) is believed to be a more effective tool than intravenous urography (IVU) in the evaluation of acute renal colic[1]

  • Age, history of ipsilateral renal or ureteral calculi episodes (OR, 2.669; 95% CI, 1.281–5.687), stone burden (OR, 3.499; 95% CI, 1.284–9.530), and radiopaque stone (OR, 2.351; 95% CI, 1.049–5.267) were significant predictors of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) failure in all patients

  • For treating symptomatic ureteral stones, those with smaller size, radiolucency, and without a history of ipsilateral renal or ureteral calculi could be considered for first-line therapy with ESWL

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) is believed to be a more effective tool than intravenous urography (IVU) in the evaluation of acute renal colic[1]. It has become a popular investigation for emergency department (ED) patients presenting with suspected renal colic. With a sensitivity of 94–100% and specificity of 92–100%, NCCT is more effective than IVU as a first-line confirmation tool for ureteral stones in the emergency department[1]. IVU is more convenient than NCCT as an intra-operative adjunct for radiolucent ureteral stones if ultrasonic localization is not possible[6]. There is a difference between the accumulated evidence of predictors based on NCCT and those available in clinical practice

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call