The efficacy of current treatment processes to remove, inactivate, or reduce environmental bloom-forming Escherichia coli.

Abstract

Escherichia coli is excreted in high numbers from the intestinal tract of humans, other mammals, and birds. Traditionally, it had been thought that E. coli could grow only within human or animal hosts and would perish in the environment. Therefore, the presence of E. coli in water has become universally accepted as a key water quality indicator of fecal pollution. However, recent research challenges the assumption that the presence of E. coli in water is always an indicator of fecal contamination, with some types of E. coli having evolved to survive and grow in aquatic environments. These strains can form blooms in water storages, resulting in high E. coli counts even without fecal contamination. Although these bloom-forming strains lack virulence genes and pose little threat to public health, their presence in treated water triggers the same response as fecal-derived E. coli. Yet, little is known about the effectiveness of treatment processes in removing or inactivating them. This study evaluated the effectiveness of current treatment processes to remove bloom-forming strains, in comparison to fecal-derived strains, with conventional coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation and filtration investigated. Second, the effectiveness of current disinfection processes-chlorination, chloramination, and ultraviolet (UV) light to disinfect bloom-forming strains in comparison to fecal-derived strains-was assessed. These experiments showed that the responses of bloom isolates were not significantly different from those of fecal E. coli strains. Therefore, commonly used water treatment and disinfection processes are effective to remove bloom-forming E. coli strains from water.IMPORTANCEThe presence of Escherichia coli in water has long been used globally as a key indicator of fecal pollution and for quantifying water safety. Traditionally, it was believed that E. coli could only thrive within hosts and would perish outside, making its presence in water indicative of fecal contamination. However, recent research has unveiled strains of E. coli capable of surviving and proliferating in aquatic environments, forming blooms even in the absence of fecal contamination. While these bloom-forming strains lack the genes to be pathogenic, their detection in source or drinking water triggers the same response as fecal-derived E. coli. Yet, little is known about the efficacy of treatment processes in removing them. This study evaluated the effectiveness of conventional treatment and disinfection processes in removing bloom-forming strains compared to fecal-derived strains. Results indicate that these commonly used processes are equally effective against both types of E. coli, reassuring that bloom-forming E. coli strains can be eliminated from water.