The efficacy and safety outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure in Thailand: Phramongkutklao experience.

Abstract

BackgroundCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is one of the crucial treatments in patients with symptomatic heart failure reduced ejection fraction. This study aimed to report the efficacy and safety of CRT implantation in treating patients with heart failure. The responders and related outcomes were also analyzed.MethodsMedical records of all patients with CRT implantation, because of heart failure treatment indication, in Phramongkutklao Hospital between 2008 and 2019 were reviewed. Free from death and heart failure hospitalization were analyzed as composited efficacy outcomes with survival analysis. Follow‐up echocardiography was used to define a responder. The safety outcomes were reported using descriptive data. Cox‐proportional hazard model analysis was used for the responder as a predictor of outcomes.ResultsA total of 152 patients underwent CRT implantation because of heart failure. 77.63% were male, the mean age of 65.9 ± 13.19 years, 59.85% were diagnosed with ischemic cardiomyopathy, mean LVEF of 22.69 ± 7.51%, and QRS duration of 147 ± 21 ms. Mean Follow‐up was 41 months. The composited efficacy outcomes were 91.7%, 54.8%, and 35.4% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. CRT‐related complications were found in 12 patients (7.89%). 71.30% of patients who were responders had lower death or heart failure hospitalization when compared to non‐responders (HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24–0.78).ConclusionThe efficacy and safety in CRT treating patients in our center were consistent with the previous randomized and observational studies. The responder rate remained the same as in previous trials but was a strong predictor for better outcomes.