The efficacy and safety of macitentan in Fontan-palliated patients: results of the 52-week randomised, placebo-controlled RUBATO trial

Abstract

Abstract Background The clinical utility and long-term effects of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) in Fontan-palliated patients remain unclear and there are currently no approved therapies. A decline in peak VO2 between consecutive cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPETs) is highly prognostic for death or transplant in adult Fontan patients, hence its use as a primary endpoint in clinical trials of ERAs in patients with Fontan circulation. Purpose The RUBATO trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of macitentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, in Fontan-palliated patients over 52 weeks. Methods In the multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 RUBATO trial, Fontan-palliated patients were randomised 1:1 to macitentan 10 mg once-daily or placebo for 52 weeks. Eligible patients were aged ≥12 years, in New York Heart Association functional class II or III, had no limitations for CPET (including no pacemakers), had undergone lateral tunnel or extracardiac conduit Fontan (total cavopulmonary connection) >1 year before screening and showed no signs of Fontan failure or clinical deterioration within 3 months before screening. Primary efficacy endpoint was change in peak VO2 from baseline to week 16. Secondary endpoints were change in peak VO2 from baseline over 52 weeks and change in mean count per minute of daily physical activity from baseline to week 16 as measured by an accelerometer. Adverse events were also assessed. Results 137 patients were randomised to macitentan (n=68) or placebo (n=69). 92.7% of patients completed 52 weeks of double-blind treatment: 7 and 3 patients prematurely discontinued study treatment in macitentan and placebo arms, respectively. Patient baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. At week 16, the mean (SD) change from baseline in peak VO2 was –0.16 (2.86) with macitentan vs –0.67 (2.66) mL/kg/min with placebo (median unbiased estimate of the difference between macitentan and placebo: 0.62 mL/kg/min [99% repeated confidence interval –0.62; 1.85], p=0.1930). No treatment effect was observed in the two secondary endpoints (Table 2): mean (SD) count per minute of daily physical activity decreased from baseline to week 16 by 3.02 (92.44) with macitentan and by 14.34 (117.56) with placebo (p=0.4512). The most common AEs were headache (10.3% vs 8.7% on placebo), nasopharyngitis (5.9% vs 4.3%), and pyrexia (5.9% vs 4.3%). AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were reported in 3 (4.4%) and 1 (1.4%) of macitentan and placebo patients. Conclusion The 52-week RUBATO trial provides an important addition to data on the clinical utility of ERAs in Fontan-palliated patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was not met and no treatment effect was observed for the two secondary endpoints. Macitentan was well tolerated; safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of macitentan 10 mg. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd., a Janssen pharmaceutical company of Johnson & Johnson.