Abstract

There has been long-standing controversy regarding the effectiveness and safety of lenalidomide as a maintenance treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after allogeneic cell transplantation. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the effectiveness and safety of lenalidomide in the maintenance treatment of MM patients after allogeneic cell transplantation based on published data. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in English and Chinese databases, covering all available publications until 1 December 2020. Statistical analysis was performed using the software STATA 14.0, and odds ratios (ORs) combined with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to explore the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in the treatment of MM patients after allogeneic cell transplantation. A total of 173 MM cases in 8 independent studies from 2007 to 2014 were included. Through a single-arm meta-analysis of the disease status of MM patients after lenalidomide treatment, 3.6% of patients were in minimal response (MR, P=0.006), 39.0% were in complete remission (CR, P=0.169), 20.2% in partial remission (PR, P<0.001), 12.8% in very good partial remission (VGPR, P=0.049), and 9.7% in SD (P=0.023); the PD was 5.6% (P=0.010). Through meta-analysis of adverse reactions after taking lenalidomide, 35.3% (P=0.628) of participants developed acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD); 22.6% (P=0.049) developed chronic GVHD; 20.3% (P=0.001) developed infection; 22.5% (P=0.352) had thrombocytopenia; 32.5% (P<0.000) had neutropenia; pain occurred in 17.8% (P=0.350) of patients, and peripheral neuropathy occurred in 17.8% (P=0.995) of participants. The overall survival (OS) of ≥2 years and progression-free survival (PFS) of ≥2 years of MM patients after allo-hematopoietic-stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) taking lenalidomide were analyzed, and the results were 64.9% (P=0.049) and 58.4% (P=0.890), respectively. Lenalidomide is effective in the treatment of MM patients after allo-HSCT, and reducing the incidence of infection and peripheral neuropathy, but it is not effective in reducing GVHD and blood system adverse reactions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call