Abstract

e23107 Background: The prevalence of people living with metastatic solid cancers is increasing. Such patients can experience cancer-related fatigue, decreased physical function (PF), and poor quality of life (QoL). Exercise has been shown to improve these symptoms in the curative setting, but there is uncertainty about the efficacy and safety of exercise in patients with metastatic cancer. Methods: Studies were identified from 3 prior systematic reviews and updated using a search of PubMed. Included studies were prospective randomized controlled trials of any moderate/high intensity aerobic exercise or resistance training intervention versus control in patients with metastatic solid cancers. The mean score and standard deviation (SD) for validated outcome measures (QoL, PF, and fatigue) were extracted for intervention and control groups at baseline and post-intervention. The effect of exercise was evaluated as the pooled change between baseline and post-intervention comparing exercise and control groups. Analysis was performed using the Mann Whitney test. Results: Of 21 trials which met inclusion criteria, 7 were excluded due to incomplete data. Among patients with mean baseline scores, exercise was not associated with significant change in fatigue, PF or QoL, although improvement was noted in 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) (14.7 vs 27.4 meters). QoL scores showed non-significant improvement (0.4 vs 4.9). In those with baseline scores 2SD below mean, exercise provided clinically meaningful improvement in PF using two different subscales (0.44 vs 8.5 and -1.0 vs 5.1) and avoidance of decline in 6-MWT (-29.75 vs -0.38m), although these did not meet statistical significance. There was a statistical improvement in sit-to-stand at the mean and 2 SD below the mean (2.5 vs 6.5, p = 0.029) for both groups. Only 5 papers reported adverse events in a standardized fashion in both groups. No differences in falls, fractures, or pain were reported. Conclusions: In patients with metastatic solid cancers, exercise interventions are associated with clinically meaningful improvements in PF, and statistically improved sit-to-stand scores. The effects are seen in patients with baseline score at the mean or lower.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call