The efficacy and safety of adding on or switching to peginterferon α-2b in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with long-term entecavir treatment: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Abstract

The strategies of adding on or switching to peginterferon (PEG-IFN) improved the serological response rates in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who had previously experienced treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues. However, robust data on which combination strategy is more effective remain lacking. In this multicentre, parallel, open-label, randomised, controlled trial, patients with HBeAg-positive CHB who were treated with entecavir ≥2 years, and had hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) <3000 IU/ml, HBeAg <200S/CO and HBV DNA <50 IU/ml were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to add on PEG-IFN, switch to PEG-IFN or continue entecavir monotherapy for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was HBeAg seroconversion at week 48. A total of 153 patients were randomised into three treatment arms (50 in add-on, 52 in switch-to and 51 in monotherapy). Compared with continuous entecavir monotherapy, both add-on and switch-to strategies achieved higher rates of HBeAg seroconversion (18.0% vs. 2.0%, p=0.007; 19.2% vs. 2.0%, p=0.005, respectively), HBeAg loss (24.0% vs. 5.9%, p=0.010; 23.1% vs. 5.9%, p=0.013, respectively), HBsAg < 100 IU/ml (30.0% vs. 0%, p < 0.001; 34.6% vs. 0%, p < 0.001, respectively), and higher HBsAg reduction (-0.90 vs. -0.06 log10 IU/ml, p < 0.001; -0.92 vs. -0.06 log10 IU/ml, p < 0.001, respectively) at week 48. The efficacy was comparable between add-on and switch-to arms (p >0.05). Adverse events were mainly related to PEG-IFN but generally tolerable. In patients with CHB who achieved virological response with long-term entecavir, both adding on and switching to PEG-IFN are alternative strategies resulting in higher rates of HBeAg seroconversion and HBsAg reduction than continuous entecavir. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR-IPR-17012055).