Abstract

Wild bees are important pollinators in many ecosystems threatened by anthropogenic disturbance. Urban development can reduce and degrade natural habitat for bees and other pollinators. However, some researchers suggest that cities could also provide refuge for bees, given that agricultural intensification may pose a greater risk. In this study, we surveyed bee communities at 15 farms and gardens across an urban-rural gradient in southeastern Michigan, USA to evaluate the effect of urbanization on bees. We examined how floral resources, bee functional traits, temperature, farm size, and the spatial scale of analysis influence bee response to urbanization. We found that urbanization positively affected bee diversity and evenness but had no effect on total abundance or species richness. Additionally, urbanization altered bee community composition via differential effects on bee species and functional groups. More urbanized sites supported a greater number of exotic, above-ground nesting, and solitary bees, but fewer eusocial bees. Blooming plant species richness positively influenced bee species diversity and richness. Furthermore, the amount of available floral resources was positively associated with exotic and eusocial bee abundances. Across sites, nearly 70% of floral resources were provided by exotic plants, most of which are characterized as weedy but not invasive. Our study demonstrates that urbanization can benefit some bee species and negatively impact others. Notably, Bombus and Lasioglossum (Dialictus), were two important pollinator groups negatively affected by urbanization. Our study supports the idea that urban environments can provide valuable habitat for diverse bee communities, but demonstrates that some bees are vulnerable to urbanization. Finally, while our results indicate that increasing the abundance and richness of floral resources could partially compensate for negative effects of urbanization on bees, the effectiveness of such measures may be limited by other factors, such as urban warming.

Highlights

  • Managed and wild bee species are threatened by multiple stressors, which have resulted in significant population declines and the extinction of certain species [1,2,3]

  • We investigated how urbanization at the landscape scale and floral resource availability at the local scale influenced wild bee communities at farms and gardens across an urban-rural gradient in southeast Michigan, USA

  • While research indicates that honey bees can have competitive effects of on wild bees [47], we found no significant relationship between honey bee and wild bee abundance (R2 = 0.058, t13 = 1.065, P = 0.306)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Managed and wild bee species are threatened by multiple stressors, which have resulted in significant population declines and the extinction of certain species [1,2,3]. Other studies indicate urbanization may enhance bee abundance and/or species richness [15,16,17], or that such effects vary across different land uses within a city [18,19]. The increased habitat heterogeneity in cities could support more diverse bee communities than those in more homogenous rural environments [15]. Consideration of how bee abundance, diversity, community composition, and species richness vary across an urban gradient will help explain such contrasting responses

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call