Abstract
In studies of stimulus control of sexual arousal, some researchers transform raw data to z-scores. Earls, Quinsey and Castonguay [ Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16, 493–500 (1987)] have argued that the proportion of variance due to stimulus presentations was greater in z-scores than in the raw data or in a percent score. We present analyses of sexual arousal data that show that z-score transformations may distort the information inherent in the raw data and may increase random error. In addition, we present Monte Carlo analyses indicating that the z-score transformation compromises the estimates of Type I error, and, depending on specific circumstances, sometimes increases and sometimes decreases the power of the statistical test. Transformation of raw data to percent of full erection does not distort the information in the raw data, does not compromise the data analyses and, therefore, is the preferred transformation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
