The Effects of Surgical and Chemical Delay Procedures on the Survival of Arterialized Venous Flaps in Rabbits

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a surgical delay procedure and a combined surgical and chemical delay procedure on the survival of arterialized venous flaps. Experimental groups included (1) a control group, (2) a surgical delay (4-day and 7-day delay) group, and (3) a combined surgical and chemical (doxazosin mesylate, nitroglycerine patch) delay group. These groups were further divided into subgroups (n = 10) depending on the delay period and the chemical agents. An arterialized venous flap was created on one ear of each rabbit. In the arterialized venous flap, arterial inflow was provided by anastomosis of the central auricular artery to the anterior branch of the central auricular vein and a venous outflow through the anterior marginal vein. In the control group, the arterialized venous flaps without any delay procedure showed complete necrosis of all flaps. In the surgical delay group, the mean percentage survival of arterialized venous flaps was 36.6 percent in the 4-day delay group and 59.7 percent in the 7-day delay group. In the combined surgical and chemical delay group, a 3-day chemical delay followed by a 4-day simultaneous surgical and chemical delay resulted in mean percentage survival of the arterialized venous flaps of 81.1 percent in the doxazosin mesylate group, 72.8 percent in the nitroglycerine patch group, and 92.9 percent in a combination group of doxazosin mesylate and nitroglycerine patch. A 3-day chemical delay followed by a 7-day simultaneous surgical and chemical delay resulted in mean percentage survival of the arterialized venous flaps of 94 percent in the doxazosin mesylate group, 90.2 percent in the nitroglycerine patch group, and 99 percent in a combination group of doxazosin mesylate and nitroglycerine patch. In conclusion, the surgical delay procedure increased the percentage survival of the arterialized venous flaps in proportion to the delay period. The combination group of surgical and chemical delay procedures had a significantly greater percentage survival than that of the surgical delay group (p < 0.001), and the delay period could be shortened. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 102: 1134, 1998.)