Abstract

RationaleStress is associated with increased sensitivity to threat. Previous investigations examining how stress affects threat processing have largely focused on biomarker responses associated with either the sympathetic-nervous-system (SNS) or the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis.ObjectivesWe pharmacologically suppressed activations of SNS, HPA, or both, prior to stress and investigated how each stress system modulates social threat assessment.MethodsOne hundred sixty-one healthy men and women were randomized in a between-subject design, to one of four pharmacological or placebo conditions: dexamethasone–placebo, placebo–propranolol, dexamethasone–propranolol, or placebo–placebo. Participants provided threat assessments for angry and neutral human faces on a baseline day, and immediately after stress induction on a testing day.ResultsWith both systems responding normally to stress (placebo–placebo), threat assessment was higher for neutral faces compared with angry. Compared with placebo, SNS suppression resulted in increased threat assessment for angry faces. HPA suppression resulted in decreased threat assessment for neutral and angry faces. When both systems were suppressed, there was an increase in threat assessment for angry faces, and no difference from placebo for neutral.ConclusionOur findings demonstrated that when intact, the biological stress systems adaptively support organisms during stress by focusing attention towards specific stimuli that are relevant to the threat. Dysregulations of the stress systems result in important system specific consequences on threat evaluation, such that suppression of either stress system alone resulted in reduced threat assessment for contextually relevant threatening stimuli, whereas when both systems were suppressed, individuals appear indiscriminately attentive to all potential threats in the environment, resulting in increased threat processing of both contextually relevant and irrelevant stimuli. Given that stress-related psychopathologies have been associated with dysregulations of the stress systems and biased responses to social threat, a systematic understanding of the mechanisms that underlie how stress systems modulate social threat assessment is needed, and can provide important insights into the cognitive processes that are involved in the development and maintenance of stress-related psychopathologies.

Highlights

  • To successfully navigate in an information rich world, we need to be able to efficiently process a constant influx of stimuli and discriminately attend to only the relevant information

  • SNS activation results in the release of catecholamines—adrenaline (A) and noradrenaline (NA) by the locus coeruleus (LC)—and the secretion of salivary Alpha-Amylase, while activation of the HPA axis triggers the release of the glucocorticoid (GC) hormone, cortisol, from the adrenal-cortex

  • Post hoc tests revealed that compared with PLC, cortisol levels were significantly lower in DEX (p < 0.001) and DP (p < 0.001) conditions, and salivary Alpha-Amylase (sAA) levels were significantly lower in PROP (p < 0.001) and DP (p < 0.001) conditions (Table 1, supplemental Fig. S1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To successfully navigate in an information rich world, we need to be able to efficiently process a constant influx of stimuli and discriminately attend to only the relevant information This ability becomes even more critical when we are confronted with threat and have to quickly and accurately identify it, and mount appropriate responses to deal with it. SNS activation results in the release of catecholamines—adrenaline (A) and noradrenaline (NA) by the locus coeruleus (LC)—and the secretion of salivary Alpha-Amylase (sAA), while activation of the HPA axis triggers the release of the glucocorticoid (GC) hormone, cortisol, from the adrenal-cortex Both catecholamines and GC have been shown to modulate threat processing in limbic regions, the hippocampus and amygdala (Herman et al 2005), along with other brain areas involved in stress appraisal, such as the prefrontal cortex (Roozendaal 2002). Here we used pharmacological challenges to systematically suppress activations of SNS, HPA, or both, prior to acute stress, to investigate how each stress system, independently activated, modulates social threat assessment

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.