Abstract
Reversal of deficits in prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex in rats is considered a preclinical screen for potential antipsychotics. Whereas acutely administered antipsychotics consistently reverse apomorphine-induced deficits in PPI, some antipsychotics, including haloperidol, are unable to reverse deficits in PPI produced by non-competitive NMDA antagonists such as phencyclidine or dizocilpine (MK-801). Acute administration of antipsychotics tends to facilitate baseline PPI. However, the effect is generally not large enough in magnitude nor reliable enough to be considered a useful preclinical screen for antipsychotic activity. Because the clinical effects of antipsychotics typically require subchronic administration, this study tested the hypothesis that reversal of NMDA antagonist-induced deficits in PPI by antipsychotics require subchronic administration. A second aim of this study was to determine if subchronic administration of an antipsychotic produces a more potent facilitation of baseline PPI than acute administration. Rats received a subcutaneous injection of 0, 0.025, 0.1 or 0.5 mg/kg haloperidol for 16 consecutive days. On day 16, half the rats in each haloperidol dose group received a second subcutaneous injection consisting of either dizocilpine (0.1 mg/kg) or saline. None of the haloperidol doses tested had a significant effect on baseline PPI. The 0.1 mg/kg dose of haloperidol diminished but did not completely reverse dizocilpine-induced disruption of PPI. The other doses had no significant effect. These results suggest that time course factors may partially modify the effects of haloperidol on dizocilpine-induced disruption of PPI but not its effect on baseline PPI.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.