Abstract

This study examined how student characteristics (e.g., race, gender) and teacher characteristics (e.g., race, gender, years of experience, confidence in behavior management) influence the way teachers perceive and respond to student behaviors in the U.S.A. A rigorous process was used to develop and pilot a survey consisting of questions about a defiant student behavioral incident that might be encountered in a school. This process involved systematically identifying student names that would imply different gender/ethnicity combinations, creating the instrument using these names, expert review, cognitive interviews, and a pilot study using 135 pre-service teachers. After refining the instrument based on feedback from each of these activities, we administered it to 57 practicing teachers. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four scenario conditions, each of which implied a student with a different gender/ethnicity combination (i.e., African American female student, African American male student, European American female student, European American male student). Although some interesting trends in responding emerged based on the implied student race and ethnicity, none were statistically significant. However, teacher characteristics significantly influenced responding, with less experienced teachers being less likely to ignore behaviors – and more likely to address them directly – than their more seasoned counterparts. This adds to the extant knowledge about how teachers in different phases of their careers may interpret and approach classroom situations, and reveals implications for teacher professional development efforts. Further implications, limitations, and future directions are also discussed.

Highlights

  • Participants were randomly assigned to one of four scenario conditions, each of which implied a student with a different gender/ethnicity combination (i.e., African American female student, African American male student, European American female student, European American male student)

  • This phenomenon has been consistently documented beginning with the seminal Children’s Defense Fund study (1975), which found that African American students were two to three times as likely to be suspended from school as their White counterparts

  • Teachers rated students presenting mainstream cultural values as having significantly higher classroom motivation and academic achievement than students exhibiting African American values. These studies suggest that teachers may not exhibit outright racial bias, they may show a preference for traditional European American-valued behaviors over conduct that may be more typical or valued by African Americans. These findings suggest that further research is needed to explore the interactions between race, gender and behavior and how they influence teachers’ impressions towards student behavior (Chang & Sue, 2003)

Read more

Summary

Literature Review

Disciplinary disproportionality – known as the “discipline gap” – refers to the overrepresentation of some student populations in school-based disciplinary proceedings. One of the most marked examples of this phenomenon in the U.S.A. is the disproportionate representation of African American students in school suspensions, expulsions, and other disciplinary actions This phenomenon has been consistently documented beginning with the seminal Children’s Defense Fund study (1975), which found that African American students were two to three times as likely to be suspended from school as their White counterparts. Findings indicate that these trends have persisted (e.g., Noltemeyer & Mcloughlin, 2010; Skiba et al, 2011), the source of the discrepancy continues to be debated. Given the severity of these and other potentially negative correlates of suspensions and expulsions, this study aims to explore the role of teacher and student characteristics in explaining disciplinary disproportionality

Student Characteristics and Discipline
Teacher Characteristics and Discipline
Rationale for Study
Purpose and Research Questions
Instrument Development
Participants
Procedures
Quantitative
Qualitative
Quantitative Results
Discussion
Implications
Limitations
Future Directions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call