Abstract

Background: Pulmonary hypertension development in pure severe aortic stenosis is a situation that affects mortality and morbidity. Material and Methods: Data from files of 31 patients with systolic pulmonary artery pressure over 50 mm Hg and with pure severe aortic stenosis, and underwent aortic valve replacement in our clinic were examined retrospectively. Results: Preoperative effort capacities of the patients were evaluated as follows according to NYHA; 4 patients class 1-2, 16 patients class 3, and 11 patients class 4. Twenty-five metal, and 6 biologic aortic valves were used. Postoperative hospital mortality was recorded as 12% with 4 patients. Patients were reevaluated on the postoperative 2nd and 12th months. Pulmonary arterial pressure of the patients was measured using echocardiography. Preoperative average pulmonary artery systolic pressure was measured as 55 ± 3 mmHg. The average pressure was measured as 41 ± 3 mmHg on the 2nd, and as 37.8 ± 4 mmHg on the 12th month. The effort capacity evaluation in the postoperative 2nd month was as follows: 11 patients class 1-2, 12 patients class 3, and 4 patients class 4. The effort capacity evaluation conducted in the 12th month was: 14 patients were class 1-2, 10 patients were class 3, and 2 patients were class 4. During the follow-up 1 year, survival rate of the patients was determined as 83.8% average, 5 year survival rate was determined as 61.5%. Conclusion: We believe that AVR may be performed in severe aortic stenosis cases with high pulmonary pressure with acceptable ortality, leading to a better quality and longer life.

Highlights

  • Cases with aortic valve area below 0.6 cm2/m2 are accepted as severe aortic stenosis (AS) [1,2]

  • Lesser and incomprehensive series were published in the literature in regards to implementation of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in pure severe aortic stenosis with pulmonary hypertension when compared to the other factors

  • Cases below 0.6 cm2/m2 with valve area in aortic narrowness are accepted as severe aortic stenosis [1,2]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cases with aortic valve area below 0.6 cm2/m2 are accepted as severe aortic stenosis (AS) [1,2]. The negative prognosis indicators limiting surgery include: narrow aortic valves, left ventricle function disorder, severe aortic stenosis with low aortic valve gradient, severe aortic stenosis with pulmonary hypertension development, and aortic stenosis with cardiac arrhythmia [6,7,8]. Material and Methods: Data from files of 31 patients with systolic pulmonary artery pressure over 50 mm Hg and with pure severe aortic stenosis, and underwent aortic valve replacement in our clinic were examined retrospectively. The effort capacity evaluation in the postoperative 2nd month was as follows: patients class 1-2, patients class 3, and 4 patients class 4. Conclusion: We believe that AVR may be performed in severe aortic stenosis cases with high pulmonary pressure with acceptable mortality, leading to a better quality and longer life

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call