The Effects of Running Kinematics on Peak Upper Trunk GPS-Measured Accelerations during Foot Contact at Different Running Speeds

Abstract

The overall aim of this study was to determine the effects of running kinematics on the peak upper trunk segmental accelerations captured with an accelerometer embedded in a commonly used GPS device. Thirteen male participants (age: 27 ± 3.7 years, height: 1.81 ± 0.06 m, mass: 82.7 ± 6.2 kg) with extensive running experience completed a single trial of treadmill running (1 degree inclination) for 40 s at nine different speeds ranging from 10 to 18 km/h at 1 km/h increments. Three-dimensional peak upper trunk acceleration values were captured via a GPS device containing a tri-axial accelerometer. Participants’ running kinematics were calculated from the coordinate data captured by an 18-camera motion capture system. A series of generalized linear mixed models were employed to determine the effects of the kinematic variables on the accelerometer acceleration peaks across the key gait phases of foot contact. Results showed that running kinematics had significant effects on peak accelerometer-measured accelerations in all axes (p < 0.05). Overall, peak segment velocities had a larger effect than joint/segment kinematics on resultant (F values = 720.9/54.2), vertical (F values = 149.8/48.1) and medial–lateral (F values = 55.4/33.4) peak accelerometer accelerations. The largest effect on peak accelerometer accelerations were observed during the impact subphase of foot contact at the adduction/abduction velocity of the shank (F value = 129.2, coefficient = −0.03) and anterior/posterior velocity of the pelvis (F value = 58.9, coefficient = 0.01). Axis-dependent effects of running kinematics were also observed, specifically at the trunk segment in the vertical and anterior–posterior peak accelerometer accelerations. This study showed the intersegmental relationship between joint/segment kinematics, segment velocities and the resulting peak accelerations of the upper trunk during running over several speeds. These findings provide insights into the lower body’s GRF attenuation capacity and its contribution to trunk stability whilst running.