Abstract

The goal of resuscitative fluid therapy is to rapidly expand circulating blood volume in order to restore tissue perfusion. Although this therapy often serves to improve macrohemodynamic parameters, it can be associated with adverse effects on the microcirculation and endothelium. The endothelial surface layer (ESL) provides a protective barrier over the endothelium and is important for regulating transvascular fluid movement, vasomotor tone, coagulation, and inflammation. Shedding or thinning of the ESL can promote interstitial edema and inflammation and may cause microcirculatory dysfunction. The pathophysiologic perturbations of critical illness and rapid, large-volume fluid therapy both cause shedding or thinning of the ESL. Research suggests that restricting the volume of crystalloid, or “clear” fluid, may preserve some ESL integrity and improve outcome based on animal experimental models and preliminary clinical trials in people. This narrative review critically evaluates the evidence for the detrimental effects of resuscitative fluid therapy on the ESL and provides suggestions for future research directions in this field.

Highlights

  • The Effects of Resuscitative Fluid Therapy on the Endothelial Surface LayerThe goal of resuscitative fluid therapy is to rapidly expand circulating blood volume in order to restore tissue perfusion

  • The importance of microcirculatory function and health of the endothelium has become a large area of interest for criticalists in the last two decades

  • Further experiments showed that perfusion of blood vessels with plasma was more effective at restoring normal vascular permeability after crystalloid infusion [119], compared with an albumin solution, indicating that substances within plasma are important for maintaining normal transvascular fluid flux

Read more

Summary

The Effects of Resuscitative Fluid Therapy on the Endothelial Surface Layer

The goal of resuscitative fluid therapy is to rapidly expand circulating blood volume in order to restore tissue perfusion This therapy often serves to improve macrohemodynamic parameters, it can be associated with adverse effects on the microcirculation and endothelium. Research suggests that restricting the volume of crystalloid, or “clear” fluid, may preserve some ESL integrity and improve outcome based on animal experimental models and preliminary clinical trials in people. This narrative review critically evaluates the evidence for the detrimental effects of resuscitative fluid therapy on the ESL and provides suggestions for future research directions in this field

INTRODUCTION
Fluids and Endothelial Surface Layer
Basic Structure and Function
Reduction in dose of clear fluids
Assessment of Shedding
Inflammation and Shock
Natriuretic Peptides
Biomarker Type
FLUID TYPES
Isotonic Crystalloid Fluid
Synthetic Colloid Fluids
Hypertonic Crystalloid Fluids
GLYCOPROTECTIVE THERAPIES
Restricting or Avoiding Fluid
Slowing Fluid Administration
Choice of Clear Fluid Type
Adjunctive Therapies
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.