Abstract
AbstractThis paper investigates the consequences of removing the requirement from Australian corporate law that dividends can only be paid out of retained earnings. Using a difference‐in‐difference design, I find that firms with negative retained earnings and more volatile earnings increased dividends after the law change, consistent with the arguments of proponents of the law change. However, I further find that the law change is associated with a significant increase in cost of debt, decrease in debt maturity and increased reliance on bank debt. These results are consistent with increased agency costs of debt after the relaxation of dividend restrictions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
