The effects of perturbation type and direction on threat-related changes in anticipatory postural control.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the type and direction of postural perturbation threat differentially affect anticipatory postural control. Healthy young adults stood on a force plate fixed to a translating platform and completed a series of rise-to-toes movements without (No Threat) and with (Threat) the potential of receiving a postural perturbation to either their feet (15 participants) or torso (16 participants). Each type of perturbation threat was presented along the anteroposterior (A-P) or mediolateral (M-L) axis. For each condition, the A-P center of pressure (COP) signal and tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus (SOL) electromyographical (EMG) recordings were used to quantify the anticipatory postural adjustment (APA). Results indicated that across both threat types and directions, postural threat induced a 40.2% greater TA activation (p<0.001), a 18.5% greater backward COP displacement (p<0.001) and a 23.9% greater backward COP velocity (p<0.001), leading to larger and faster APAs than the No Threat condition. Subsequently, a 7.7% larger forward COP displacement (p=0.001), a 20.4% greater forward COP velocity (p<0.001) and 43.2% greater SOL activation (p=0.009) were observed during the execution phase of the rise-to-toes for the Threat compared to the No Threat condition. Despite these threat effects, there were no differences in the magnitude or velocity of APAs between the threat directsion conditions. Since the type and direction of perturbation-induced postural threat had minimal differential effects on anticipatory postural control, these factors are unlikely to explain the discrepancy of previous findings.