Abstract

Land‐use change can alter trophic interactions with wide‐ranging functional consequences, yet the consequences for aquatic food webs have been little studied. In part, this may reflect the challenges of resolving the diets of aquatic organisms using classical gut contents analysis, especially for soft‐bodied prey. We used next‐generation sequencing to resolve prey use in nearly 400 individuals of two predatory invertebrates (the Caddisfly, Rhyacophila dorsalis, and the Stonefly Dinocras cephalotes) in streams draining land with increasingly intensive livestock farming. Rhyacophila dorsalis occurred in all streams, whereas D. cephalotes was restricted to low intensities, allowing us to test whether: (i) apparent sensitivity to agriculture in the latter species reflects a more specialized diet and (ii) diet in R. dorsalis varied between sites with and without D. cephalotes. DNA was extracted from dissected gut contents, amplified without blocking probes and sequenced using Ion Torrent technology. Both predators were generalists, consuming 30 prey taxa with a preference for taxa that were abundant in all streams or that increased with intensification. Where both predators were present, their diets were nearly identical, and R. dorsalis's diet was virtually unchanged in the absence of D. cephalotes. The loss of D. cephalotes from more intensive sites was probably due to physicochemical stressors, such as sedimentation, rather than to dietary specialization, although wider biotic factors (e.g., competition with other predatory taxa) could not be excluded. This study provides a uniquely detailed description of predator diets along a land‐use intensity gradient, offering new insights into how anthropogenic stressors affect stream communities.

Highlights

  • Anthropogenic activities are altering biodiversity and species composition at an unprecedented rate globally (Sala et al, 2000)

  • It was predicted that: (i) being generalists, both predators would consume a wide range of prey taxa in proportion to their availability, so that their diets tracked changes in potential prey across the agricultural intensity gradient, but that (ii) the lower resilience of D. cephalotes to agricultural stressors compared to R. dorsalis would be reflected in narrower diet breadth and stronger prey selection; and (iii) the absence of competition from D. cephalotes at the highest agricultural intensities would result in R. dorsalis having a wider feeding niche relative to the available prey diversity

  • Agricultural intensification did not significantly change predator foraging behaviour or diet, as preferred prey taxa were resistant to agricultural stressors and abundant across the intensity gradient

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Anthropogenic activities are altering biodiversity and species composition at an unprecedented rate globally (Sala et al, 2000). Several experimental studies have confirmed that changing predator densities produces complex effects on stream ecosystems (e.g., Rodrıguez-Lozano, Verkaik, Rieradevall, & Prat, 2015; Woodward, Papantoniou, Edwards, & Laurisden, 2008), but studies of changes in trophic interactions across stress gradients have been limited to acidification (Layer, Riede, Hildrew, & Woodward, 2010) and temperature (O’Gorman, Fitch, & Crowe, 2012) This dearth of studies may be due to the difficulties of resolving freshwater food webs: predator–prey interactions cannot be observed directly, whilst visual identification of predator gut contents is demanding and may overlook soft-bodied prey (Symondson, 2002). It was predicted that: (i) being generalists, both predators would consume a wide range of prey taxa in proportion to their availability, so that their diets tracked changes in potential prey across the agricultural intensity gradient, but that (ii) the lower resilience of D. cephalotes to agricultural stressors compared to R. dorsalis would be reflected in narrower diet breadth and stronger prey selection; and (iii) the absence of competition from D. cephalotes at the highest agricultural intensities would result in R. dorsalis having a wider feeding niche relative to the available prey diversity

| METHODS
| RESULTS
| DISCUSSION
Findings
DATA ACCESSIBILITY
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call