Abstract
To study why discussion appears to improve vocabulary learning, children in two intact classes were divided into three subgroups and taught science vocabulary on 3 successive days. For each lesson, one subgroup was told they would not be called on and were to learn by listening. Of the other two subgroups, only one was actually called on (Called-on) and the other merely anticipated being called on (Ignored). Two additional classes served as comparison groups. Students in the treatment group generally outperformed those in the two comparison groups on the posttests, regardless of condition. Within the treatment group, students in both anticipatory conditions (Called-on and Ignored) significantly outperformed students in the Listening condition on the delayed posttest, but not on the immediate posttest. These results are discussed within the context of a generative model of vocabulary learning.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.