Abstract

Separate groups of gerbils received 100%, 50%, or 0% reinforcement during avoidance acquisition. A reinforced trial was one in which the avoidance contingency was in effect, while a nonreinforced trial was a CS-US pairing. Groups trained under either partial or continuous reinforcement were subdivided into two extinction conditions, 100% classical CS-US trials or regular avoidance extinction. In acquisition, CR frequency and percent reinforcement were positively related. Significantly more rapid extinction obtained under the CS-US pairing procedure relative to regular avoidance extinction, and animals trained under partial reinforcement were more resistant to extinction than animals trained under continuous reinforcement. These results were interpreted in terms of the effects of delayed punishment on nonreinforced trials in acquisition and extinction.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.