Abstract
Affordance theory and behavioural dynamics have been used as theoretical constructs to explain how individuals interact with the environment in order to avoid obstacles. Features of obstacle distance and multiple obstacle avoidance have been discussed in unique studies, yet the interactions of these environmental features have yet to be explored. The purpose of this study was to asses the effects of obstacle distance, relative to the goal, on aperture crossing strategies. Kinematics and gaze behaviours were assessed in a cohort of female young adults (N=24, 21.3±1.4years). Results identified that participants chose to navigate through gaps of 1.3× shoulder width or greater, regardless of obstacle distance. However, safety margin in the anterior-posterior direction was found to increase with increased obstacle distance, suggesting unique environmental affordances for each obstacle distance. Therefore, although decision making on whether to navigate through, or around, the aperture appears to be unaffected by obstacle location, specific environmental features result in unique kinematic behaviours. Such behaviours fit within, and add merit to, the tenets of both affordance theory and behavioural dynamics.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.