Abstract

IntroductionMoral distress is widespread in health care, and nurses working in high-pressure environments, such as emergency departments, experience stress at high rates. Understanding how moral distress affects pediatric emergency nursing care is essential to moderate its negative impacts. Increased resilience has been promoted as a tool to mitigate moral distress. The purpose of this study, conducted prior to the pandemic, was to examine patterns of moral distress and the impact of moral distress on resilience among pediatric emergency nurses. MethodsA cross-sectional exploratory study of pediatric emergency nurses was performed. Moral Distress Scale-Revised (Pediatric) and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 25© scores were collected and calculated. Exploratory factor analysis with principal components was used to identify patterns of moral distress that impact resilience. ResultsFour distinct patterns of moral distress that impact resilience were identified: (1) incompetent practice, (2) incongruent truth-telling, (3) potentially inappropriate care, and (4) discordant health care teams. DiscussionOur study was the first to identify 4 patterns of moral distress in pediatric emergency nurses. As a result, actions to promote resilience include: (1) supporting competent practice, (2) upholding appropriate truth-telling, (3) recognizing and addressing potentially inappropriate care, and (4) building concordant health care teams and systems. This pre-pandemic data provides a foundational understanding of the relationship between moral distress and resilience in pediatric emergency nurses. Identifying factors of moral distress that impact resilience has significant implications for pediatric emergency nursing, including the development of future initiatives, education, and research.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call