Abstract

This study compared metalinguistic and exemplar-based written corrective feedback (CF) for their effects on Korean university students’ grammatical accuracy improvement regarding English verb complementation errors. This study was conducted in a writing class where two types of multimedia components were used for writing instruction: mini-lessons based on PowerPoint slides and a movie. This study also investigated how learners perceived the CF they received. Fifty-two learners, divided into two groups (i.e., metalinguistic and exemplar), participated in this class for 10 weeks. A sentence completion test and a narrative writing test were administered to measure learners’ verb complementation knowledge before and after the treatment. In the treatment sessions, learners were given a mini-lesson on English verb complementation using PowerPoint slides, watched part of a Korean movie, and then wrote a summary of the given movie part. Learners received either of the two types of CF on their written errors. This treatment procedure lasted for eight weeks. The results revealed that both feedback types were beneficial. Learners in both groups significantly improved their verb complementation knowledge. Though no significant difference between both groups was found, more learners preferred exemplar-based to metalinguistic CF.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.