Abstract

Many analytical techniques have been developed for the inelastic analysis of multi-storey framed structures subjected to earthquake excitations. Most of these analyses have ignored the influence of the geometric effects due to the large lateral displacements on the response of the structure. However, there has been an increasing interest recently in these second order effects and, in particular, their consequences for the design of the column members in the frame. This paper describes the modification of an inelastic frame analysis to include the effects of large displacements and then the application to three typical New Zealand concrete structures subjected to a variety of earthquake excitations. Comparisons are then made with results obtained from analyses ignoring these effects. The results are then reviewed in order to determine the nature of the problems, to determine when these second order effects should be considered and discusses methods of limiting these displacements.

Highlights

  • Most analyses of multi-storeyed reinforced concrete frames subjected to earthquake excitation have ignored the secondary effect due to the combination of gravitational forces and large displacements

  • For the second analysis, where the strength was increased by 25% while maintaining the original stiffness, the increase in maximum interstorey drift was reduced to 21% of the non P-Delta value for the original frame

  • The original program has been extended and modified so that the ultimate strengths of the members are given in terms of maximum positive and negative moments for beams, while for column members sufficient information can be given to define the maximum extent of the load-moment interaction curve in tension and compression

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most analyses of multi-storeyed reinforced concrete frames subjected to earthquake excitation have ignored the secondary effect due to the combination of gravitational forces and large displacements. The top storey deflections and interstorey drifts under Parkfield and Pacoima are greater than the code allowable values though the maximum plastic hinge rotations are capable of being achieved in well detailed structures.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.