Abstract
ABSTRACT Research on the first year of higher education (FYHE) has shown that students benefit from scaffolding to ease the transition to university. Constructively aligned assessment and feedback are integral to a scaffolded approach. Low-stakes interim assessments and feedback can reduce uncertainties around higher-stakes assessments and help students meet key learning outcomes. This small-scale study investigated the effects of one-on-one interim feedback conversations (FCs) with students in a first-year modern history course. Two datasets were used and compared. First, the students were surveyed about their perspectives on FCs after they took place. Second, analytics data provided insights into engagement and assessment performance across the cohort. Considering these datasets alongside each other suggests that FCs, though a popular and beneficial feedback mode, are unlikely to override other known success factors. However, the positive reception and apparent benefits of FCs make them a viable option for implementing interim feedback in the FYHE.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Innovations in Education and Teaching International
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
