Abstract
The performance of 18 lower-class boys on four WISC subtests was assessed under two conditions of test administration, the standard one and one in which an imposed latency period was included. These boys generally did better in the latter condition, suggesting that the nature of the stimulus task affected the quality of the response produced.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
