The Effects of Hyperacute Serum on Adipogenesis and Cell Proliferation of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.

Abstract

Fat tissue, due to its high concentration of stem cells, has a role in aesthetic medicine and reconstructive surgery. However, poor survival of the transplanted cells still limits the usefulness of this material in regenerative medicine. Several studies indicated that platelet-rich plasma (PRP) may improve adipose tissue viability due to its growth factor content. This study aimed at investigating the effects of PRP and hyperacute serum (HAS) on the adipogenic lineage in vitro. PRP was prepared by using two centrifugation steps in the presence of anticoagulants, and HAS was isolated from activated platelet-rich fibrin within 10 min of blood drawing to prevent the propagation of inflammatory cascades. Metabolic activity and proliferation rate of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) cultivated in media supplemented with three types of serum additives (fetal calf serum [FCS], human PRP, or HAS) was determined by using a tetrazolium assay. Adipogenesis was evaluated in standard and pro-adipogenic media and tested by oil red staining, triglyceride content, and expression of specific genes. Adipogenic regulators in the sera were measured by multiplex ELISA assays. We observed that proliferation of hMSCs was supported by both FCS and HAS in a time-dependent manner, but surprisingly, PRP had a much weaker effect (change in proliferation rate after 5 days relative to metabolic activity on day 0-FCS: 5.4-fold change, HAS: 5.8-fold change, serum free 1.9-fold change, PRP: 3.0-fold change, p < 0.05). Lipogenesis was only observed in groups with adipogenic differentiation medium, with HAS showing a significantly stronger effect than PRP. This was confirmed by intensive accumulation of lysochrome dye in lipid droplets, higher triglyceride concentration, and elevated expression of specific adipogenic genes. Measurement of lipogenic proteins in the sera revealed that both PRP and HAS are abundant in them; however, PRP also contains anti-adipogenic factors, which explains its weaker and less reliable effect. The results of this study suggest that HAS provides more robust support than PRP in hMSCs proliferation as well as lipogenic differentiation, indicating that it may be a better adjuvant in fat grafting procedures.