Abstract
Abstract Results from laboratory PVT measurements and near-wellbore condition coreflood studies are used to develop models and empirical correlations which can be used in numerical simulators and pseudopressure models to predict condensate well performance. The laboratory studies were conducted to evaluate the characteristic effects of immobile and mobile condensate saturations on the mobility of gas in the near-wellbore region. The gas flowrates studied span both the Darcy and non-Darcy flow regimes. The experimental data were used in both analytical and numerical simulation models to estimate the well productivity changes due to the presence of condensate in the near-wellbore region. Analysis of experimental data and simulation results show that the net effect of the various phenomena occurring in the near wellbore region is a balance between those effects that reduce well productivity (inertial effects), and those effects that increase well productivity (viscous stripping and mist flow). Results show that capillary desaturation and viscous stripping of condensate may occur in the near wellbore region and the productivity in gas condensate reservoirs may not be greatly impaired as predicted in some works. The paper discusses and provides data/models for the following parameters or phenomena:The onset of velocity stripping,Effect of velocity on critical condensate saturation,Gas permeability reduction due to immobile condensate,Modifications to relative permeabilities at high velocities and/or low interfacial tensions, andnon-Darcy flow parameters in gas condensate flow. Introduction Three things are essential in the development of gas condensate fields:That in the original well testing of the field, accurate values of the gas/condensate ratio (GOR) are determined. This is important in the determination of initial in place reserves and fluid composition.That the GOR behaviour of the production wells is understood so that history matching to early data can be accurate.That the general long term behaviour of the reservoir and the liquid recovery factors expected in any planned gas injection process are realistic. The producing GOR is often used as indication of the efficiency of a producing gas condensate well. Many times the separator GOR's will be too high depending upon whether the well is being produced at too high or too low a flowrate (Fig. 1). At too low a flowrate holdup of the retrograde condensate in the formation results in excessive producing GOR's. At very high flowrate, as the pressure drops below the dewpoint, the liquid will drop out and begin to collect in the near wellbore region. In so doing, produced hydrocarbons will contain less liquid than they should and therefore the GOR will be erroneously high. Near Wellbore. The production of gas condensate below the dewpoint will result in the accumulation of liquid phase condensate in the near wellbore area, which in turn will ultimately impair the gas phase permeability. This near well accumulation of liquid is the result of the gas phase dropping out its associated condensate at a more rapid rate in its approach to the wellbore in response to the pressure sink created by the producing well. This problem is made worse due to the fact that the throughput of the gas phase per unit rock volume progressively increases with decreasing distance from a wellbore with radial drainage. The degree to which the gas phase flow will be impaired is governed by the saturation of liquid phase. P. 823^
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.