The effects of grazing and nutrient inputs on grass-heather competition

Abstract

Summary A combination of field and pot experiments was used to investigate the relative importance of grazing pressure and resource availability in grass-heather competition. In pots where nutrients were added, Nardus acquired the additional nutrients more rapidly than Calluna and increased its above-ground biomass to a greater extent. However, in the field, when fencing and fertilizer treatments were applied to a fine-scale mosaic of Calluna and grasses, including Nardus, nutrient addition only benefited Nardus in unfenced areas. In areas where sheep and deer were excluded, nitrogen addition increased heather cover; Nardus cover declined despite the added nutrients, possibly because the absence of grazing allowed heather to close its canopy above the Nardus, a shade-intolerant species. Effects were site dependent, with fencing increasing heather cover more rapidly on some plots than others; sites where grass cover was declining were the ones where grasses showed the smallest uptake of fertilizer. The results demonstrate that nitrogen additions well above the suggested critical load for heather moorland do not lead to a significant loss of heather cover if herbivory is absent, at least not within three years. It is suggested that the loss of heather moorlands to grass-dominated vegetation in Scotland may principally be driven by grazing, rather than nutrients.