The Effects of Engineered Skeletal Muscle on Volumetric Muscle Loss in The Tibialis Anterior Of Rat After Three Months In Vivo.

Abstract

Volumetric muscle loss (VML) is traumatic, degenerative, or surgical loss of skeletal muscle that exceeds the regenerative capacity of the remaining muscle, thus resulting in impaired muscle function. In humans, the loss of 30% or more mass of any one muscle will result in permanent structural and functional loss. Current VML repair treatments are limited by donor site morbidity and graft tissue availability, necessitating alternative muscle graft sources. To address this need, our lab has fabricated tissue-engineered skeletal muscle units (SMUs) for implantation into a 30 % VML model in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle of rat. Previous results showed that after 28 days in vivo, muscle with a 30% VML repaired with our SMUs produced significantly more force than muscle with acute VML. But repair with our SMU did not fully restore muscle force production to that of native muscle. Thus, we hypothesized that more time for in vivo tissue regeneration would allow for greater force recovery. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the long-term (3-month) effects of our SMUs on a 30% VML repair. We also assessed the effects of reinnervation by redirecting a branch of the peroneal nerve to the repair site. Thirty-nine, 2-month old female F344 rats were separated into a nonsurgical control group (n=5) and four surgical experimental groups (VML Only, n=5; VML+Nerve Redirect, n=6; VML+SMU, n=5; VML+SMU+ Nerve Redirect, n=8). Experimental rats were allowed a 3-month recovery period post-surgery before undergoing in situ force testing of the surgical (left) TA. The left TA of the control animals also underwent in situ force testing. Finally, the surgical (left) and contralateral (right) TAs of the experimental animals, as well as the left TA of the control animals, were explanted for histological analysis. Results for specific force showed that while all groups recovered specific forces similar to that of native muscle, the two SMU groups had significantly higher specific forces, on average, compared to the uninjured control group. Histological staining showed small muscle fibers in the repair site in animals that received an SMU. The average cross-sectional area of the native fibers just outside the area of repair (or the equivalent area in control animals) was not significantly different between groups, indicating that hypertrophy of remaining fibers did not contribute to the recovery of force following the VML. Our results suggest that following a 30% VML of the TA muscle, all surgical groups were able to recover TA mass, maximum tetanic and specific force production. Thus, creating a 30% VML in the TA in a rat model is not enough a sufficient VML to produce the sustained VML seen in humans following similar 30% loss of muscle volume.